Differences

This shows you the differences between two versions of the page.

Link to this comparison view

Both sides previous revision Previous revision
Next revision
Previous revision
Next revision Both sides next revision
xro:rollohack_gw60 [2015-10-09 17:05]
xro
xro:rollohack_gw60 [2015-10-15 12:20]
xro
Line 64: Line 64:
 The ZB40 can select one of three or all three rollos and send commands UP, DOWN, STOP. Simplest minimum implementation would require at least 4 bits. So I could hope that one-byte bruteforcing might still yield results. Two byte bruteforcing while also guessing the bps would be impossible in the 60s pairing mode window of the GW60. Unfortunately:​ NO LUCK. The ZB40 can select one of three or all three rollos and send commands UP, DOWN, STOP. Simplest minimum implementation would require at least 4 bits. So I could hope that one-byte bruteforcing might still yield results. Two byte bruteforcing while also guessing the bps would be impossible in the 60s pairing mode window of the GW60. Unfortunately:​ NO LUCK.
  
-Status: ​grudgingly ordered a overpriced ZB40 with even more prohibitive 9,90 shipping costs from Germany.+Yes, at this point I could just a well have soldered something on the PCB and simulated button presses. But I was curious now, so I grudgingly ordered a overpriced ZB40 with even more prohibitive 9,90 shipping costs from Germany.
  
 === Listening In === === Listening In ===
  
 Next step: Listening in on the ZB40 talking to the GW60 using my OpenBench Logic Analyzer. Next step: Listening in on the ZB40 talking to the GW60 using my OpenBench Logic Analyzer.
 +
 +{{:​xro:​rollo_gw60_zb40_signal.tar.xz|OpenBench LogicSniffer recorded signals, Sigrok format}}
realraum Graz, Brockmanngasse 15, 8010 Graz, realraum - Verein für Technik in Kultur und Gesellschaft
  • /var/lib/dokuwiki/data/pages/xro/rollohack_gw60.txt
  • Last modified: 2017-06-11 15:12
  • by xro